media & legal strategies
confidential hotline 0845 528 0706

Poison Pylons

Sunday Mirror Newspaper - March 2014

A whistleblower approached us after becoming infuriated that the Environment Agency would not 
stop energy firms from spreading poisonous lead paint flakes near schools and on allotments and 
For two years the whistleblower had tried to get the Environment Agency to prevent energy 
companies from spreading the toxic waste when they refurbish pylons.
Instead, the Environment Agency has allowed energy firms to regulate themselves despite the fact 
they have a duty to investigate them and prosecute them as part of the Environment Act.
We contacted the Sunday Mirror which set up its own investigation alongside the whistleblower 
and published the story across two pages.
Read the full story here.
Toxic: Paint that has fallen from electricity pylons
The Sunday Mirror's Ben Glaze investigates paint that has been scrapped from Electricity Pylons in the areaBut rather than using special wrapping – claimed to cost £28,000 per pylon – it is believed contractors in Lancashire have just scrubbed away

 previous coats with wire brushes and let debris float to the ground.

Experts say exposure to even low levels of lead can cause harm. It is known to be toxic to organs and tissue including the heart, bones, intestines, 

kidneys and ­reproductive and nerve systems.

It is particularly dangerous to children and can cause learning and behavioural disorders. Other symptoms when there 
are high levels include abdominal pain, confusion, headaches, anaemia, irritability and, in the most severe cases, seizures, comas and even death.

We took two samples from an allotment, which has a swing in the middle and is near a school. Results revealed the flakes were “toxic for reproduction”

 and may cause “malformation”.

Before our probe, our source, who lives near Preston, Lancs, had already conducted four tests on scrapings below pylons near his home, and results 

came back showing all contained toxic levels.

He has been trying to get the issue tackled for three years but in January this year workmen began taking paint off a pylon on his land, too.

Worryingly, he witnessed geese and hens from the allotment pecking around by the ­scrapings, raising fears the animals had ingested chemicals and 

passed them into the food chain. “This stuff is toxic. On a windy day it goes everywhere. It could get into the food supply. Here on the allotments people

 are going to be cutting their veg and putting it into their cooking pots that night,” our whistleblower said.

“Similarly, if people eat eggs laid by these hens, how do they know what’s in them?

“And what about the little girl playing on the swing who picks up a piece of this paint and says, ‘What’s this, Daddy?’ before putting it near her mouth?”When the old paint is removed it is left on the ground near schools and homes
 Both Electricity North West, which is responsible for the pylon we tested, and the Government’s Environment Agency said they were investigating.

It is thought thousands of pylons across the UK could still have layers of old paint containing lead beneath more recent coats – meaning the rest of the

 nation could also be at risk. Our source said: “These things were put up all over the country and were painted with heavy lead paint because they 

couldn’t make other paint stick in the outside environment. Yes, they need to repaint these pylons to protect them for the future, but that doesn’t mean 

they can contaminate the land.”

Our tests in Lancashire revealed lead contents of 5.42 per cent and 3.23 per cent. The flakes were rated H10 and H14, meaning they were “ecotoxic” and

 “toxic for reproduction”.

Substances classified as H10 are those “which, if they are inhaled or ingested or if they penetrate the skin, may induce non-hereditary congenital 

malformations or increase their incidence”.

Ecotoxic waste “presents or may present immediate or delayed risks for one or more sectors of the environment”.

Wyndham Johnston, of LPD Lab ­Services, which conducted the tests, said: “Your two samples have a significant amount of lead. Five per cent of that

 paint flake by weight is lead, which is a lot. Ecotoxic is toxic in the environment and toxic for reproduction means you can have issues with any 

reproducing – animals and humans – if you’re having a baby.”

He warned that animals chewing on paint flakes would be consuming lead, adding: “The worst thing is if you ingest it – eating it or breathing it in.”Imposing: The pylons
 Mr Johnston said the flakes should only be removed by “a proper hazardous waste contractor”.

Our team was also taken to a nearby site next to a modern housing estate and discovered paint littering long grass below two pylons.

Our whistleblower first sent samples to be examined in May 2011 and was horrified when the results confirmed his worst fears. 

A report said: “All the submitted samples tested are considered to be hazardous in nature and will therefore require specialist disposal.”

As well as lead, they also contained chemicals, cadmium and chromium, in “trace quantities”.

A second test also came back positive and a report warned: “The lead values are high and represent considerable toxic potential.

 Advice should be sought from an Environmental Health Specialist.”

A separate analysis for Electricity North West in September 2011 concluded: “All the samples contain lead associated with the oldest paint layers.”

 It added: “It is recommended Electricity North West seek advice from a specialist consultant with regard to the toxicity and potential risk to cattle.”

 The landowner raised concerns with Electricity North West and the ­Environment Agency over what officials were doing to warn the school and 

allotment owners about the potential danger.

A letter last year from Agency chairman Lord Chris Smith said: “We requested that the Energy Networks Association’s membership develop a

 methodology to include the collection and disposal of waste as a best practice approach.

“We requested this was adopted throughout the sector. I am satisfied this is the most responsible way to secure an environmentally sound approach.”

But the landowner accused the Agency of being “unbelievably blasé”.

The GMB spokesman called on the Health and Safety Executive to begin immediate discussions with power companies to put in place a

 national programme to protect people. A spokesman added: “It’s a disgrace that our national infrastructure in private hands is deteriorating in this way.”

Local Labour MP Graham Jones said ­Electricity North West had vowed to ensure no more paint was removed until the issue was explored.

He added: “There is a probability it is private contractors. Clearly there needs to be a risk assessment. The public quite naturally will be concerned

 and it is important ENW not only act but keep people informed.”

Electricity North West said: “We are working with the Environment Agency following a specific complaint.”